journal features
movie reviews
photo of the day

plastics

the journal of Michael Werneburg

twenty-eight years and a million words

Tokyo, 2008.01.17

My mother gave me a book for X'mas titled "The World Without Us". It discusses what might happen to the planet should something like a nasty virus or conventional war* should suddenly remove humans. It's quite well written, and depicts a much 'healthier' world. I have to say it's making a real believer out of me (not a good sign considering I'm about to become a parent).

There is one horrifying element discussed in the book that has never before crossed my mind. It turns out that many cosmetics contain plastics. So, even if you're properly recycling your cosmetics containers, the actual cosmetics themselves get washed into the ocean and contribute to the ever-increasing permanent load of plastics there. And don't kid yourself that the plastics will break down; they just get torn into smaller pieces.

Apparently they've been found in the digestive systems of creatures as small as krill, the tiny crustaceans that form the basis of the oceans' food chain. Naturally, they can kill anything that consumes them.

I'm not sure what to do about this, yet, but there is one thing that's clear: I'm immediately ceasing use of the exfoliant scrubs I've got that contain polyethylene. I'm going to look for 100% natural varieties instead. And I think I'll also write to the manufacturers and tell them I'm switching. But I've got two unused bottles set aside; what to do with the stuff.

How do you 'properly dispose' of this shit? Burn it? Bury it? I'm pretty sure that in Tokyo the garbage is either burned or "buried at sea".

*I think it's just fantastic that we consider war a conventional activity, and that the conventional type is the one to hope for!

rand()m quote

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

—Michael Crichton